Tax planning might become “aggressive” in case the minimum threshold of “fair share of taxation” is not met.
Contact Hendrik-Jan van Duijn

When is tax planning aggressive?

In tax-linked I provided my view on the question:”When does tax planning become agressive?”. Please find my response to this question below.

When countries can define and agree on a “fair share of taxation” then there would be a consensus about a minimal amount of taxation. Tax planning might become “aggressive” in case the minimum threshold of “fair share of taxation” is not met. Getting to a consensus and to a definition of “aggressive tax planning” is therefore still a long way away…

Currently it seems that there is a public debate on what a fair share of taxation is. There are seemingly proper and improper ways to use tax treaties, hybrid instruments and hybrid structures. Even business models, the way we are doing business, employing staff and so on is put under a magnifying glass. The question arises when is enough taxation enough.
In the discussion about what aggressive tax planning is, the purpose and its consequence is not always taken into account. An investor would like to have a sufficient return of its investment. Taxation lowers the return on investment, which makes the investment less lucrative. The BEPS discussion provides uncertainty about the return on investment and is therefore rather harmful for countries which appreciate investment.

My focus is on genuine businesses, with functions and risks aligned, international start-ups and Dutch entrepreneurs. This client base is marginally negatively affected by the BEPS discussion. Although, the compliance expenses are expected to increase due to the new regulations, these compliance expenses are relatively low in the Netherlands, so an competitive advantage is also likely to become apparent.
Holding companies are still in strong demand, whereby a safe and solid economic environment is more important than the tax aspects of a chosen jurisdiction. The developments regarding the Bilateral Treaty Investment, is more important for these companies than BEPS.”..

Tags

Meer blogs van Hendrik-Jan van Duijn

Dutch Tax Plan 2020: Corporate Income Tax Changes Tax Plan 2019: What will become reality? Conversion of a negative capital account into debt Enforcement Plan Labour Relations Caution: Obligation to Declare Benchmark Reports Tax Plan 2019 Will a foundation have to file its annual accounts in the future? Going international? Consider Japan! Doing business in Singapore Avert pending tax penalties by the proper tax deferral The Dutch Dividend Withholding tax exemption: structures with hybrid entities Tax Deferral to avoid pending Tax Liabilities Tips to Avoid Fiscal Repercussions of The Economic Crisis Does the Netherlands have withholding taxes? To be or not to be: Dutch dividend withholding tax Expansion of the dividend withholding tax exemption and broadening dividend withholding tax base to include holding cooperatives Thoughts on the new Dutch coop regime Does the Brexit affect my Dutch tax practice? 30% ruling Netherlands The BEPS Action 7 Series Tax changes in 2016 Dutch tax compliance Personal income tax returns Dutch hybrid structures Dutch dividend withholding tax returns Dutch customs compliance Dutch corporate income tax questions Does the Netherlands have withholding taxes? Do tax treaties restrict Dutch taxation? Company Profit Tax Rates Europe Tax Return Abroad Terms of Use Tax treaty comparison Career Amsterdam Tax lawyer Dutch Rulings 30 Tax Ruling Netherlands Netherlands tax consultant Dutch VAT Return Dutch tax treaty analysis Dutch Tax Penalties Dutch tax opinions Dutch Tax FAQ Dutch dividend withholding tax reduction for South African investments Can I deduct educational expenses? Can I deduct my travel expenses? Dutch dividend withholding tax infringement free capital movement New Substance Regulations for Financial Service Companies in the Netherlands Answers to questions on the ATAD1 legislation Dutch substance changes 2014 Converting into a Dutch entity: An overview